C
C
Genuine Joe Clear Trash Can Liners - Small Size - 16 gal Capacity - 33" Length x 24" Width x 0.60 mil (15 Micron) Thickness - Low Density - Clear - 500/Box - 1 / Carton
- Great for recycling and pilferage control
- High-clarity, clear film so you can see what's inside the bag
- Star-bottom construction for even distribution of contents
- Comes on coreless roll for easy dispensing
- Linear low-density for a higher tensile strength and superior impact-resistance and puncture-resistance compared to low-density polyethylene
Description
Specifications
UNSPSC Code
47121701
Weight
14.88lb
Height
4.88in
Width
12.13in
Length
16.75in
Additional Information
25 Bags/20 Rolls
Assembly Required
No
Bag Length
33"
Bag Size
33" x 24"
Bag Thickness
0.60 mil (15 Micron)
Bag Width
24"
Brand
Genuine Joe
Brand Name
Genuine Joe
Category
Trash Bags & Liners
Color Family
Clear
Country of Origin
United States
Density
Low
Features
Star Bottom Seal
Manufacturer
Genuine Joe
Manufacturer Part Number
01011
Manufacturer Website Address
http://www.genuinejoe.com
Packaged Quantity
1
Product Color
Clear
Product Name
Clear Trash Can Liners
Product Type
Trash Bag
Quantity Per Container
500/Box
Recycled
No
Size Standard
Small
Volume Capacity
16 gal
Alternatives
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
selection not available, try a different combination
selection not available, try a different combination
Compare
Big Box Price Compare
|
Date of last check: 08/16/2025 |
$62.69
|
Big Box Price Compare
|
|
Date of last check: 08/16/2025 |
$62.69
|
C
C
Genuine Joe Clear Trash Can Liners - Small Size - 16 gal Capacity - 33" Length x 24" Width x 0.60 mil (15 Micron) Thickness - Low Density - Clear - 500/Box - 1 / Carton
- Great for recycling and pilferage control
- High-clarity, clear film so you can see what's inside the bag
- Star-bottom construction for even distribution of contents
- Comes on coreless roll for easy dispensing
- Linear low-density for a higher tensile strength and superior impact-resistance and puncture-resistance compared to low-density polyethylene
Alternatives
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C